Safe System, Vision Zero, and Sustainable Safety: a scoping review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55329/ekkh3689Keywords:
Safe System, Sustainable Safety, Vision ZeroAbstract
In this study, we provide a scoping review of the research literature on Vision Zero, Safe System and Sustainable Safety. Using a simplified PRISMA approach, we identify 129 studies, describing what year and where the studies are from, which topics the studies are about, and how the terms are used. Using a thematic analysis of the abstracts of the 129 studies, we identify seven main study topics in the studies. The most prevalent study topics are: 1) Case study/Implementation study, 2) Study on principles, 3) Study on practical/strategic use, 4) Study on "readiness", or factors that inhibit or promote implementation, 5) Vulnerable road users, inequality and social justice, 6) Results of measures and potential, and 7) Future challenges and solutions. We describe knowledge status, knowledge gaps and questions for future research within each study topic. The studies find that entities that have formally implemented the Safe System have relatively low levels of implementation, due to implementation barriers and operationalization challenges. The studies find that it is not necessarily clearly defined what Vision Zero/Safe System is in practice, and that the concept must be interpreted and translated by those who will implement it. Thus, current road safety policies do not fully realise the potential improvements that Safe System can provide, because the principles are not followed to a sufficient extent. A Norwegian study estimate that the number of road fatalities in Norway can be reduced by 50%–70% by following the Safe System principles fully and systematically. Thus, a major challenge, also in mature Safe System contexts, is to facilitate actual Safe System implementation, by mapping barriers/facilitators and Safe System readiness, and defining actions to realise the full potential of Safe System implementation.
Downloads
Author Biographies
Tor-Olav Nævestad, Institute of Transport Economics, Norway
Tor-Olav Nævestad heads the research group ‘Safety and Resilience’ at the Institute of Transport Economics in Oslo, Norway. He has been working on projects related to safety culture, safety management and regulation among companies and authorities in the transport sector and in high-risk sectors. One of the key themes in his research has been to develop an understanding of how the safety culture concept can be applied to private and professional road users, and how this understanding can be used to develop measures aiming to improve road safety. Tor-Olav Nævestad also conducts research on resilience and disaster risk management.
CRediT contribution: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing.
Ingeborg Storesund Hesjevoll, Institute of Transport Economics, Norway
Ingeborg Hesjevoll is a research psychologist in the group for safety, security and resilience at the Institute of Transport Economics. She has experience with a wide range of research topics and methodologies related to road safety, including literature reviews and research synthesis, survey-based accident registration for vulnerable road users, analyses of accident data and in-depth accident registrations, and survey research more generally.
CRediT contribution: Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft.
Rune Elvik, Institute of Transport Economics, Norway
Rune Elvik has been a road safety researcher at the Institute of Transport Economics since 1980. His main areas of research have been evaluation studies, meta-analysis and cost-benefit analysis. Rune Elvik served as editor-in-chief (together with Karl Kim) of Accident Analysis & Prevention from 2005 to 2013. He has participated in many European projects and contributed to the Highway Safety Manual. He has published more than 190 papers in scientific journals.
CRediT contribution: Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft.
Øyvind Lothe Brunstad, Institute of Transport Economics, Norway
Øyvind holds a Master’s degree in Business and Economics from the Norwegian University of Life Science (NMBU) and is currently employed as a researcher at the Institute of Transport Economics in Oslo, Norway. Øyvind have mostly been working on projects related to socio-economic analysis in the transport sector, as well as projects utilizing diverse GIS-software and GPS-data. Øyvind also conducts research on traffic safety, e.g. related to collision safety for bus drivers, active and passive safety measures for heavy vehicles and research on Safe Systems, Vision Zero and Sustainable Safety.
CRediT contribution: Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft.
Jenny Blom, Institute of Transport Economics, Norway
Jenny Blom is part of the 'Safety, Security, and Resilience' research group at The Institute of Transport Economics in Norway, specializes in national and organizational safety culture, safety management, road safety policies, and traffic education. Her research primary evolves around heavy vehicle and bus companies, studying how organizational safety culture, management practices, and working conditions impact professional drivers' behaviour and accident involvement. Additionally, she studies how framework conditions and national road safety culture influences road safety behaviours. Her research extends to organizational learning, economic driving, and education of both experienced and novice drivers.
CRediT contribution: Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft.
References
Abebe, H. G. (2022). Road Safety Policy in Addis Ababa: A Vision Zero Perspective. Sustainability, 14(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095318
Abebe, H. G. (2024). Equity and Social Justice considerations in road safety work: The case of Vision Zero in New York City. Transport Policy, 149, 11–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.01.024
Alavi, H. (2023). Embedding Safe System in Victoria: Blockers, Enablers and Improvement Roadmap. Journal of Road Safety-Jrs, 34(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33492/JRS-D-22-00022
Belin, M.-Å. (2012). Vision Zero - a road safety policy innovation. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 19(2), 171–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2011.635213
Belin, M.-Å. (2021). The Swedish Vision Zero: A Policy Innovation. In R. Vickerman (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Transportation (pp. 675–680). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10206-4
Belin, M.-Å. (2022). Vision Zero in Sweden: Streaming Through Problems, Politics, and Policies. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23176-7_9-1
Bergh, T. (2003). Swedish vision zero experience. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 8(2), 159–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2003.0224
Björnberg, K. E. (2022). Vision zero and other road safety targets. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy (pp. 3–29). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_1
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cockfield, S. D., Healy, A. H., McIntyre, A., & Cavallo, A. (2022). The Development of the “Vision Zero” Approach in Victoria, Australia. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23176-7_17-1
Corben, B. F. (2010). Strengthening road safety strategy development “Towards Zero” 2008–2020 – Western Australia’s experience scientific research on road safety management SWOV workshop 16 and 17 November 2009. Safety Science, 48(9), 1085–1097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.10.005
Corben, B. F. (2022). The Importance of Adopting a Safe System Approach-Translation of Principles into Practical Solutions. Sustainability, 14(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052559
Cornelissen, M. (2015). Assessing the “system” in safe systems-based road designs: Using cognitive work analysis to evaluate intersection designs. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 74, 324–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.002
Cushing, M. (2016). Vision Zero in the United States Versus Sweden: Infrastructure Improvement for Cycling Safety. American Journal of Public Health, 106(12), 2178–2180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303466
Davis, A. L., & Obree, D. (2020). Equality of restraint: Reframing road safety through the ethics of private motorised transport. Journal of Transport & Health, 19, 100970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100970
De Bartolomeo, D. (2023). The Italian Risk-Based approach for the development of an Integrated Safety Management System for Road Infrastructures and its Relations with innovative guidelines on the risk management of existing bridges. Transportation Research Procedia, 69, 886–893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.249
Dwyer, J., Karanikas, N., & Sav, A. (2023). Scoping review of peer-reviewed empirical studies on implementing high reliability organisation theory. Safety Science, 164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106178
Ehsani, J. (2023). The Future of Road Safety: Challenges and Opportunities. Milbank Quarterly, 101, 613–636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12644
El Khalai, I. (2024). An adapted taxonomy and framework for monitoring road safety strategies: a case study of Morocco. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2024.2409645
Elvebakk, B., & Steiro, T. (2009). First principles, second hand: Perceptions and interpretations of vision zero in Norway. Safety Science, 47(7), 958–966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.005
Elvik, R. (2022). Vision zero in Norway. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy (pp. 295–306). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_10
Elvik, R. (2023). What would a road safety policy fully consistent with safe system principles mean for road safety? Accident Analysis & Prevention, 193, 107336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107336
Elvik, R., & Nævestad, T. O. (2023). Does empirical evidence support the effectiveness of the Safe System approach to road safety management? Accident Analysis and Prevention, 191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107227
Eugensson, A., & Ivarsson, J. (2022). What the car industry can do: Volvo cars. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy (pp. 687–725). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_28
Evenson, K. R. (2023). Mixed-methods approach to describing Vision Zero initiatives in United States’ municipalities. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 184, 107012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107012
Fahlquist, J. N. (2006). Responsibility ascriptions and Vision Zero. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(6), 1113–1118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.020
Fildes, B. N., Lawrence, B., Thompson, L., & Oxley, J. (2022). Speed-Limits in Local Streets: Lessons from a 30 km/h Trial in Victoria, Australia. In K. Edvardsson Björnberg, S. O. Hansson, M.-Å. Belin, & C. Tingvall (Eds.), The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy. Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23176-7_34-1
Fleisher, A. (2016). A Vision for Transportation Safety Framework for Identifying Best Practice Strategies to Advance Vision Zero. Transportation Research Record, 2582, 72–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2582-09
Fosdick, T. (2024). Creating a Cultural Maturity Model to Assess Safe System Readiness Within Road Safety Organisations. Journal of Road Safety-Jrs, 35(1), 52–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33492/JRS-D-24-1-2125507
Fuselli, P. (2022). Vision zero on federal level in Canada. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy (pp. 507–551). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_18
Ghomi, H., & Hussein, M. (2023). Moving vision zero programs forward: What pedestrian-focused countermeasure combinations work best and where? A dynamic copula-based time-series approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 192, 107229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107229
Green, M. (2022). Safe System in road safety public policy: A case study from Victoria, Australia. IATSS Research, 46(2), 171–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2021.11.006
Green, M. (2023). When policy hits the road: Safe System in Victoria’s policy environment. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 189, 107129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107129
Green, M. (2024a). Safe System in Practice: A Study of Practitioner Awareness, Support and Implementation. Journal of Road Safety-Jrs, 35(2), 36–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33492/JRS-D-24-2-2286649
Green, M. (2024b). What is the purpose? Practitioners’ perspectives of the Safe System approach to road safety in Australia. IATSS Research, 48(1), 84–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2024.01.004
Hansson, S. O. (2022a). Responsibility in road traffic. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy (pp. 177–203). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_5
Hansson, S. O. (2022b). Zero visions and other safety principles. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy (pp. 31–105). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_2
Hell, W. (2022). Vision zero in Germany. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy (pp. 337–357). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_13
Hirsch, L. (2021). Fatal footsteps: Understanding the Safe System context behind New Zealand’s pedestrian road trauma. Journal of Road Safety. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33492/JRS-D-20-00013
Hughes, B. P. (2015). System theory and safety models in Swedish, UK, Dutch and Australian road safety strategies. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 74, 271–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.017
Hysing, E. (2021). Responsibilization: The case of road safety governance. Regulation & Governance, 15(2), 356–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12288
ITF. (2016). Zero road deaths and serious injuries: Leading a paradigm shift to a safe system. OECD Publishing.
ITF. (2022). The Safe System Approach in Action. OECD Publishing.
Jamroz, K. (2022). Vision zero in Poland. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy (pp. 359–397). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_14
Jiménez, F. (2018). Chapter 6 - Driver Assistance Systems and Safety Systems. In F. Jiménez (Ed.), Intelligent Vehicles (pp. 209–226). Butterworth-Heinemann. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812800-8.00006-0
Job, R. F. S. (2022). The Ultimate Safe System: Redefining the Safe System Approach for Road Safety. Sustainability, 14(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052978
Johansson, R. (2009). Vision Zero – Implementing a policy for traffic safety. Safety Science, 47(6), 826–831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.023
Johnston, I. (2010). Beyond “best practice” road safety thinking and systems management – A case for culture change research. Safety Science, 48(9), 1175–1181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.12.003
Keefe, E. M. (2024). Using an adapted community readiness assessment to inform Vision Zero and safe systems action. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 23, 100992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100992
Khan, M. N., & Das, S. (2024). Advancing traffic safety through the safe system approach: A systematic review. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 199, 107518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107518
Kubota, H., & Kojima, A. (2024). Toward school route vision zero. IATSS Research, 48(2), 224–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2024.04.003
Larsen, H., & Bomberg, M. (2022). Fremont Vision Zero Program: 5 Years of Traffic Safety Progress and a Renewed Effort for Getting to Zero. Ite Journal-Institute of Transportation Engineers, 92(5), 35–38.
Larsson, P. (2010). The need for a systems theory approach to road safety. Safety Science, 48(9), 1167–1174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.10.006
Levac, D. H., Colquhoun, K. K., & O’Brien, K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, Article 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Lie, A., Tingvall, C., … Håkansson, M. (2022). Automated vehicles: How do they relate to vision zero. In K. Edvardsson Björnberg, S. O. Hansson, M.-Å. Belin, & C. Tingvall (Eds.), The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy. Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_39
Lopoo, L. M. (2024). An evaluation of a Vision Zero traffic-calming intervention, an urban transportation safety policy. Journal of Urban Affairs. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2024.2314040
Malik, S. (2020). Sustainable Mobility through Safer Roads: Translating Road Safety Strategy into Local Context in Western Australia. Sustainability, 12(21). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218929
Marshall, W. E. (2018). Understanding international road safety disparities: Why is Australia so much safer than the United States? Accident Analysis & Prevention, 111, 251–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.031
McAndrews, C. (2013). Road Safety as a Shared Responsibility and a Public Problem in Swedish Road Safety Policy. Science Technology & Human Values, 38(6), 749–772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913493675
McHeim, B. (2021). Use of the Safe System Assessment Framework as a Safety Key Performance Indicator. Journal of Road Safety-Jrs, 32(1), 37–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33492/JRS-D-19-00260
Michael, J. P. (2021). Roadway safety, design & equity: A paradigm shift. Journal of Transport & Health, 23, 101260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101260
Mofolasayo, A. (2024). Towards “Vision-Zero” in Road Traffic Fatalities: The Need for Reasonable Degrees of Automation to Complement Human Efforts in Driving Operation. Systems, 12(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12020040
Mohan, D. (2019). Traffic safety: Rights and obligations. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 128, 159–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.010
Mooren, L., & Shuey, R. (2024). Systems Thinking in Road Safety Management. Journal of Road Safety-Jrs, 35(2), 63–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33492/JRS-D-24-2-2109985
Muir, C. (2018). Evolution of a holistic systems approach to planning and managing road safety: the Victorian case study, 1970-2015. Injury Prevention, 24, I19–I24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042358
Nævestad, T.-O., Hesjevoll, I. S., Elvik, R., Brunstad, Ø. L., & Blom, J. (2025). Nullvisjonen og Safe System – Kunnskapsgrunnlag (TØI Report No. 2083/2025). Transportøkonomisk Institutt.
Naumann, R. B. (2019). Organizational networks in road safety: Case studies of U.S. Vision Zero cities. Traffic Injury Prevention, 20(4), 378–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1587752
Naumann, R. B. (2020). Systems Thinking in the Context of Road Safety: Can Systems Tools Help us Realize a True “Safe Systems” Approach? Current Epidemiology Reports, 7(4), 343–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-020-00248-z
Naumann, R. B. (2023). A novel Vision Zero leadership training model to support collaboration and strategic action planning. Frontiers in Future Transportation, 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffutr.2023.923786
Neill, R. (2024). Translating global evidence into local implementation through technical assistance: a realist evaluation of the Bloomberg philanthropies initiative for global Road safety. Globalization and Health, 20(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-024-01041-z
Otto, J. (2022). Increasing Readiness to Grow Traffic Safety Culture and Adopt the Safe System Approach: A Story of the Washington Traffic Safety Commission. Frontiers in Future Transportation, 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffutr.2022.964630
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., … Mulrow, C. D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Piatkowski, D. (2021). Toward a rural vision zero a qualitative exploration of bicyclist and pedestrian traffic fatalities in smalltown and rural nebraska. Great Plains Research, 31(1), 97–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/gpr.2021.0005
Pistelok, P., & Straub, D. (2021). Evaluation of the Road Policy in the Light of Vision Zero in Jaworzno, Poland. Sustainability, 13(16). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168745
Safarpour, H. (2020). Vision Zero: Evolution History and Developing Trend in Road Safety: A Scoping Review. Trauma Monthly, 25(6), 275–286.
Schell, W. J., & Ward, N. J. (2022). A process for change: The safe system approach and Vision Zero. Frontiers in Future Transportation, 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffutr.2022.982942
Schöneburg, R., & Baumann, K. H. (2022). What the car industry can do: Mercedes-Benz’ view. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy (pp. 727–754). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_29
Shaw, J. W. (2016). Developing Australia’s Highway Safety Professionals What Can the United States Learn? Transportation Research Record, 2582, 87–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2582-10
Shi, G. (2021). Sustainable Safety in The Netherlands Creating a Road Environment where People on Foot and on Bikes are as Safe as People in Cars. Transportation Research Record, 2675(11), 792–803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211019736
Shi, G. (2022). Moving Beyond the Vision Zero Slogan. Transportation Research Record. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221103245
Stigson, H., Kullgren, A., & Andersson, L.-E. (2022). Rural Road Design According to the Safe System Approach. In K. Edvardsson Björnberg, S. O. Hansson, M.-Å. Belin, & C. Tingvall (Eds.), The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy. Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23176-7_36-1
Stipdonk, H. (2024). Maturity measurement in road traffic injury prevention. Traffic Safety Research, 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55329/uvfc1655
Swedish Transport Administration. (2019). Saving lives beyond 2020: The next steps. Recommendations of the Academic Expert Group for the 3rd Global Ministerial Conference on Road Safety (Trafikverket Publikation 2019:209). Swedish Transport Administration.
Tingvall, C. (2022). Saving lives beyond 2020: The next steps. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy (pp. 789–839). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_48
Tingvall, C. (2022). Vision zero: How it all started. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy (pp. 245–266). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_8
Usami, D. S., González-Hernández, B., Persia, L., Kunsoan, N. B., Meta, E., Saporito, M. R., Schermers, G., Carnis, L., Yerpez, J., Bouhamed, N., Cardoso, J., Kluppels, L., & Vandemeulebroek, F. (2021). Defining suitable Safe System projects: The experience of the SaferAfrica project in five African countries. IATSS Research, 45(4), 594–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2021.08.001
van der Knaap, P. (2024). Sustainability, systemic change, and theory-based evaluation: Lessons from the “safe system” approach in road safety. In Towards Sustainable Futures: The Role of Evaluation (pp. 207–222). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032714936-13
Wegman, F. (2022). Sustainable safety: A short history of a safe system approach in the Netherlands. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy (pp. 307–336). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_12
Wegman, F., & Schepers, P. (2024). Safe System approach for cyclists in the Netherlands: Towards zero fatalities and serious injuries? Accident Analysis & Prevention, 195, 107396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107396
Wennberg, H., & Dahlholm, O. (2024). Traffic safety implementation at local level in line with 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: synergies, challenges and enablers. Traffic Safety Research, 5, e000055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55329/lgfl1703
Westphaln, K. K., Regoeczi, W., Masotya, M., Vazquez-Westphaln, B., Lounsbury, K., McDavid, L., Lee, H., Johnson, J., & Ronis, S. D. (2021). From Arksey and O’Malley and beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology. MethodsX, 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101375
WHO. (2025).
WHO & United Nations Regional Commissions. (2021). Global plan for the decade of action for road safety 2021-2030. World Health Organization.
Williamson, A. (2021). Why do we make safe behaviour so hard for drivers? Journal of Road Safety-Jrs, 32(1), 24–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33492/JRS-D-20-00255
World Bank. (2020). Guide for Road Safety Opportunities and Challenges: Low and Middle Income Country Profiles. © World Bank.
Žuraulis, V., & Pumputis, V. (2022). Vision zero in Lithuania. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy (pp. 399–438). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_15
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tor-Olav Nævestad, Ingeborg Storesund Hesjevoll, Rune Elvik, Øyvind Lothe Brunstad, Jenny Blom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
