Road safety capacity in Africa: benchmarking professional education through a Safe System lense
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55329/bhmb5198Keywords:
professionals training, road safety education, Safe System approach, Eastern Africa, Northern Europe, Western Africa, Western Europe, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)Abstract
Africa faces a growing road safety crisis, with the highest global traffic fatality rates and a 17% increase in deaths between 2010 and 2021, in contrast to declining trends globally. Structural and institutional challenges, including weak crash data systems, limited use of evidence-based measures, and insufficient implementation capacity, continue to hinder progress. While the Safe System approach has become the foundation of road safety policy in high-income countries, its implementation across African contexts remains limited. Professional road safety education and training are central to embedding Safe System principles, yet systematic knowledge about the scale and structure of such capacity in Africa is lacking. This study provides a Safe System cross-pillar comparison of professional road safety education and training in three African countries (Ghana, Tanzania, and Zambia), benchmarked against three European countries with established Safe System practices (Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands). Drawing on stakeholder interviews and national data, we assess training capacity and qualification requirements across the five pillars of the Safe System: road-safety management, safe roads, safe vehicles, safe road user behaviour, and post-crash care. The findings reveal substantial disparities in both the availability and institutionalisation of training. For example, the number of certified road safety auditors ranges from 0.2 per million inhabitants in Ghana to over 40 in Norway, while ambulance personnel availability differs by an order of magnitude between the African and European countries. Across pillars, common challenges include limited access to specialised and interdisciplinary education, weak formal qualification frameworks, and insufficient capacity in key domains such as infrastructure safety and post-crash care. Based on the empirical analysis, the study proposes a conceptual framework linking education and training to road safety outcomes through professional and institutional capacity. The findings suggest that strengthening road safety in African countries requires a coordinated policy approach that integrates education, regulation, and institutional development. This includes establishing formal qualification requirements for key roles, investing in interdisciplinary and locally anchored training programmes, and embedding Safe System principles across sectors. Such efforts are essential for translating the Safe System approach into effective and sustained reductions in road traffic deaths and serious injuries.
Downloads
References
Belin, M.-Å. (2021). The Swedish Vision Zero—an advanced safety culture phenomenon. Transport and safety: systems, approaches, and implementation, Springer Nature.
Elvik, R., & Nævestad, T.-O. (2023). Does empirical evidence support the effectiveness of the Safe System approach to road safety management?. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 191, 107227.
Godthelp, H., Wesemann, P., Stipdonk, H., & King, M. (2024). Capacity building for road safety in LMICs: the need for a sustainable local knowledge and research infrastructure. Traffic Safety Research, 8, e000063.
Haghani, M., Behnood, A., Dixit, V., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2022). Road safety research in the context of low- and middle-income countries: macro-scale literature analyses, trends, knowledge gaps and challenges. Safety Science, 146, 105513.
Hatakka, M., Keskinen, E., Gregersen, N. P., Glad, A., & Hernetkoski, K. (2002). From control of the vehicle to personal self-control; broadening the perspectives to driver education. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5(3), 201-215.
International Transport Forum (2022). The Safe System Approach in Action, 9282159159.
ITF (2022). The Safe System approach in action.
Nævestad, T.-O., Sam, E. F., Farah, H., Mwamba, D., & Masaki, J. (2025). Safe system implementation in three African and three European countries: Preliminary results from a comparison of six countries. Transportation Research Procedia, 89, 243-254.
Neki, K., Gutierrez, H., Mitra, S., Temesgen, M., & Mbugua, L. (2022). Addressing discrepancies in estimates of road traffic deaths and injuries in Ethiopia. Injury Prevention, 29, ip-2022.
Perel, P., Ker, K., Ivers, R., & Blackhall, K. (2007). Road safety in low- and middle-income countries: a neglected research area. Injury Prevention, 13(4), 227.
PIARC (2023). Road safety in LMICs: identification and analysis of specific issues (2023R07EN). World Road Association Technical Committee 3.1 Road Safety.
Varhelyi, A. (2016). Road Safety Management ‒ The Need for a Systematic Approach. The Open Transportation Journal, 10, 137-155.
Wegman, F., Aarts, L., & van der Knaap, P. (2023). Sustainable Safety: A Short History of a Safe System Approach in the Netherlands. The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy, Springer International Publishing. 307-336.
WHO (2004). World report on road traffic injury prevention.
WHO (2010). Global Plan for the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
WHO (2023). Global status report on road safety. World Health Organization.
WHO (2023). Status report on road safety in the WHO African Region. World Health Organization.
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aslak Fyhri, Anteneh A. Mekonnen, Haneen Farah, Tor-Olav Nævestad, Sonja Forward, Enoch F. Sam, Jaqueline E. Masaki, Thomas Miyoba, Aliaksei Laureshyn

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Funding data
-
HORIZON EUROPE Climate, Energy and Mobility
Grant numbers 101069500









