A hybrid Structural Equation Modeling and Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis framework for using limited samples to relate cycling performance to behavioral traits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55329/qjgq4392Keywords:
behavioral traffic safety, bicycle safety countermeasures, cyclist safety, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, structural equation modelingAbstract
The objective of this investigation was to explore a hybrid application of Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (FsQCA) to assess the impact of safety-related behavioural traits on the performance of bicyclists using a limited sample of data as a case study. These behavioural characteristics of cyclists are fundamental when specific cyclist groups are targeted for safety countermeasures. The data were collected from individuals who completed a survey and participated in bicycle simulator experiments. Each of the items in the survey aimed to describe how keen the rider is to take risks. The motivation for the study is the recognition that traditional statistical methods have limitations related to the model structure and the type of variables they can analyze, especially where sample sizes are limited. To address these limitations and to estimate complex relationships between variables, SEM can be used to assess the individual effect of each variable on the response variable(s). In the real-world context, however, a combination of variables can affect response variables. To address this issue, this study used the hybrid SEM-FsQCA approach, in which SEM was applied as the first step in analyzing the latent behavioural variables. Then, using the outputs of the previous step, FsQCA was applied to assess the effect of combinations of variables on the performance of cyclists. Based on SEM, none of the factors significantly affected performance, likely due to the low sample size. However, when applying FsQCA, it was observed that combinations of factors significantly affect performance. This hybrid approach was seen to be promising for the case study application and, in that context, to have the potential, even with smaller samples, to significantly contribute to a deep understanding of the safety-related behavioral traits, which can be used in designing targeted countermeasures to improve their safety.
Downloads
References
Abbasi, A. Z. (2022). The effect of three violent videogame engagement states on aggressive behavior: A partial least squares structural equation modeling approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918968
Al-Mahameed, F. J. (2019). Analyzing pedestrian and bicyclist crashes at the corridor level: Structural equation modeling approach. Transportation Research Record, 2673(7), 308–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119845353
Chen, W.-K. (2023). How Instagram influencers contribute to consumer travel decision: Insights from SEM and fsQCA. Emerging Science Journal, 7(1), 16–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-01-02
Christoforou, Z. (2023). Cycling under the influence of alcohol and other drugs: An exploratory analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 99, 204–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.10.026
Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
Hair, J. F. (2022). A Primer on Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hasan, N., Bao, Y., & Chiong, R. (2022). A multi-method analytical approach to predicting young adults’ intention to invest in mHealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telematics and Informatics, 68, 101765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101765
Kang, W., & Shao, B. (2023). The impact of voice assistants’ intelligent attributes on consumer well-being: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103130
Kraus, S., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Schüssler, M. (2018). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research–the rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14, 15–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8
Li, G. (2022). Factors Influencing Users’ Willingness to Adopt Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: Net and Configurational Effects Analysis Using PLS-SEM and FsQCA. Journal of Advanced Transportation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7489897
Liu, J. (2020). Bicyclist injury severity in traffic crashes: A spatial approach for geo-referenced crash data to uncover non-stationary correlates. Journal of Safety Research, 73, 25–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.02.006
Lu, W. (2022). Integrating machine learning into path analysis for quantifying behavioral pathways in bicycle-motor vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 168, 106622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106622
Mendel, J. M., & Korjani, M. M. (2013). Theoretical aspects of fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Information Sciences, 237, 137–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.02.048
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2022). TrafficSafetyFacts2020Data:BicyclistsandOtherCyclists.
Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
Ragin, C. C. (2009). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
Ragin, C. C. (2014). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Univ of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520957350
Ragin, C. C., & Davey, S. (2022). Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Department of Sociology, University of California.
Ragin, C. C., Strand, S. I., & Rubinson, C. (2008). User’s guide to fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis (pp. 1–87). University of Arizona. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569.n5
Rasoolimanesh, S. M. (2021). The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches: Partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. Preprint. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2020-1164
Reynolds, C. C. (2009). The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes: a review of the literature. Environmental Health, 8, 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-8-47
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4.
Sanjurjo-de-No, A., Pérez-Zuriaga, A. M., & García, A. (2023). Analysis and prediction of injury severity in single micromobility crashes with Random Forest. Heliyon, 9(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23062
Schepers, P. (2023). The relationship between cycle track width and the lateral position of cyclists, and implications for the required cycle track width. Journal of Safety Research, 87, 38–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.07.011
Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., Mikulincer, M., & Gillath, O. (2004). The multidimensional driving style inventory—scale construct and validation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36(3), 323–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00010-1
Useche, S. A. (2018). Does gender really matter? A structural equation model to explain risky and positive cycling behaviors. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 118, 86–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.022
Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118356258
Warner, J. (2017). A simulator-based analysis of engineering treatments for right-hook bicycle crashes at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 104, 46–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.021
Woodside, A. G. (2011). Responding to the severe limitations of cross-sectional surveys: Commenting on Rong and Wilkinson’s perspectives. Australasian Marketing Journal, 19(3), 153–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2011.04.004
Yang, S. (2022). Effects of stores’ environmental components on Chinese consumers’ emotions and intentions to purchase luxury brands: Integrating partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840413
Yaqoob, S. (2023a). Deep transfer learning-based anomaly detection for cycling safety. Journal of Safety Research, 87, 122–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.09.010
Yaqoob, S. (2023b). Detection of anomalies in cycling behavior with convolutional neural network and deep learning. European Transport Research Review, 15(1), 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-023-00583-4
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mahsa Jafari, Bhagwant Persaud, Carmelo D'Agostino

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Grant numbers Appl. ID RGPIN-2023-03787