Analysis of driver reaction to a pedestrian who crosses the road outside designated crosswalks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55329/ztsc4887Keywords:
driver behaviour, driving simulator, eye-tracking, pedestrian jaywalking, perception–reaction time, road safety, Southern EuropeAbstract
Pedestrian who crosses the road outside designated crosswalks represent a critical safety issue in urban environments, as they are often unexpected. Understanding how drivers perceive and respond to such events is essential for improving pedestrian safety and developing effective preventive measures. This study investigates driver perception and reaction processes in safety-critical scenarios involving the sudden appearance of a pedestrian crossing the roadway outside crosswalks, with particular attention to visual detection, reaction time, and evasive behaviour. For this study a controlled experiment was conducted using a driving simulator integrated with an eye-tracking system, allowing the joint collection of vehicle kinematic data and gaze behaviour. Two urban scenarios were designed, differing in the distance at which the pedestrian appeared: one providing sufficient stopping distance for a vehicle approaching at 50 km/h and thus placing 50 km/h speed limits, and a second scenario with a shorter appearance distance consistent with a stopping distance calculated with a speed of 30 km/h, with a 30 km/h speed limit. Driver gaze behaviour, perception time, reaction time, total perception–reaction time, and avoidance strategies were analysed under these conditions. The results confirm that crossings outside crosswalks represent a highly critical scenario, characterised by delayed visual detection, increased variability in driver responses, and a higher likelihood of delayed or ineffective evasive actions. Scenarios characterised by 50 km/h speed limits produced longer and more variable reaction times, whereas tighter spatiotemporal constraints (30 km/h scenario) resulted in faster and more consistent responses. Overall, the study highlights the need for interventions aimed at improving early pedestrian detection and driver awareness, supporting the potential role of infrastructural measures and advanced driver assistance systems in mitigating safety risks in non-designated crossing environments.
Downloads
References
Ambros, J., Šípek, M., Ševrović, M., Krizsik, N., Deane, P., Vieira, S., Karantanos, M., Mondésir, H., & Folla, K. (2025). KPI Compliance with traffic rules on unsignalized pedestrian crossings and intersections. Methodological Guidelines Report.
Banerjee, S., Jeihani, M., Khadem, N. K., & Kabir, M. M. (2021). Influence of Pedestrian Collision Warning Systems on Driver Behavior: A Driving Simulator Study. International Conference on Transportation and Development 2023: Transportation Safety and Emerging Technologies - Selected Papers, 1, 299-314.
Bella, F., & Silvestri, M. (2017). Effects of directional auditory and visual warnings at intersections on reaction times and speed reduction times. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 51, 88-102.
Bella, F., & Silvestri, M. (2021). Vehicle–pedestrian interactions into and outside of crosswalks: effects of driver assistance systems. Transport, 36(2), 98-109.
Campbell, J. L., Lichty, M. G., Brown, J. L., Richard, C. M., Graving, J. S., Graham, J., O’Laughlin, M., Torbic, D., & Harwood, D. (2012). Human Factors Guidelines for Road Systems: Second Edition.
Carini, C., Paliotto, A., Meocci, M., Mazzi, C., Torre, F. La, & Marradi, A. (2026). A driving simulator study on drivers’ reactions to sudden appearing of a Powered Two-Wheeler in a left-turn manoeuvre. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 235, 108615.
Čičković, M. (2016). Influence of Human Behaviour on Geometric Road Design. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 4364-4373.
Clabaux, N., Brenac, T., Perrin, C., Magnin, J., Canu, B., & Van Elslande, P. (2012). Motorcyclists’ speed and “looked-but-failed-to-see” accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 49, 73-77.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 1-567.
Crundall, D. (2016). Hazard prediction discriminates between novice and experienced drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 86, 47-58.
Ekman, L. (1996). On the Treatment of Flow in Traffic Safety Analysis, - a non-parametric approach applied on vulnerable road users.
European Road Safety Observatory - Mobility & Transport - Road Safety (2026).
Gitelman, V., Balasha, D., Carmel, R., Hendel, L., & Pesahov, F. (2012). Characterization of pedestrian accidents and an examination of infrastructure measures to improve pedestrian safety in Israel. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 44(1), 63-73.
Green, M. (2000). “How Long Does It Take to Stop?” Methodological Analysis of Driver Perception-Brake Times. Transportation Human Factors, 2(3), 195-216.
Green, Marc (2018). Roadway human factors: from science to application. 1-474.
Han, H., Kim, S., Choi, J., Park, H., Yang, J. H., & Kim, J. (2021). Driver’s avoidance characteristics to hazardous situations: A driving simulator study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 81, 522-539.
Hirano, R., Numasawa, K., Yoshimura, Y., Miyamoto, T., Kizuka, T., & Ono, S. (2023). The effect of eccentricity on visual motion prediction in peripheral vision. Physiological Reports, 11(22), e15877
Huang, X., Zhang, W., Sun, S., Zhang, Z., Li, J., & Chen, B. (2026). How do drivers react to crossing pedestrians at unsignalized roads? A contrast study for naturalistic driving and dummy pedestrian test. Scientific Reports, 16, 4400.
ISTAT & ACI (2023). Rapporto sull’incidentalità stradale in Italia 2023.
ISTAT & ACI (2025). Rapporto sull’incidentalità stradale in Italia 2024.
Jurecki, R. S., & Stańczyk, T. L. (2014). Driver reaction time to lateral entering pedestrian in a simulated crash traffic situation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 22-36.
Jurecki, R. S., Stańczyk, T. L., & Jaśkiewicz, M. J. (2017). Driver’s reaction time in a simulated, complex road incident. Transport, 32(1), 44-54.
Kim, K., & Yamashita, E. (2008). Corresponding characteristics and circumstances of collision-involved pedestrians in Hawaii. Transportation Research Record, 2073, 18-24.
Li, X., Rakotonirainy, A., & Yan, X. (2019). How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study. Journal of Safety Research, 70, 89-96.
Meocci, M., Terrosi, A., Paliotto, A., Arrighi, R., & Petrizzo, I. (2024). Drivers’ performance assessment approaching pedestrian crossings through the analysis of the speed and perceptive data recorded during on-field tests. Heliyon, 10(1).
Ministero dei Trasporti (2001). Decreto Ministeriale 05 Novembre 2001 “Norme funzionali e geometriche per la costruzione delle strade.
Mukherjee, D., Ramachandra Rao, K., & Tiwari, G. (2024). Pedestrian Crossing Safety at High-Risk Locations: An Inclusive Review. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 150(2), 03124001.
Paliotto, A. (2025). V4SAFETY - UNIFI Simulation.
Paliotto, A., & Meocci, M. (2024). Development of a Network-Level Road Safety Assessment Procedure Based on Human Factors Principles. Infrastructures, 9(2).
Paliotto, A., Meocci, M., Pappalardo, G., La Torre, F., Cafiso, S. D., & Tiberi, P. (2025). Analysis of different road network safety analysis procedures. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 0(0).
Paliotto, A., Meocci, M., Terrosi, A., & La Torre, F. (2024). Systematic review, evaluation and comparison of different approaches for the implementation of road network safety analysis. Heliyon, 10(7), e28391.
Rachakonda, Y., & Pawar, D. S. (2023). Evaluation of intersection conflict warning system at unsignalized intersections: A review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 10(4), 530-547.
Rasouli, A., Kotseruba, I., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2017). Agreeing to Cross: How Drivers and Pedestrians Communicate. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings, 264-269.
Rigneault, H., Kumar, N. G., Cossart, R., Septier, D., Brévalle-Waslilewki, G., Kudlinski, A., & Kaszas, A. (2014). Vehicle to Pedestrian Communications for Protection of Vulnerable road Users. Focus on Microscopy, 1, 1-6.
Scanlon, J. M., Sherony, R., & Gabler, H. C. (2016). Preliminary potential crash prevention estimates for an Intersection Advanced Driver Assistance System in straight crossing path crashes. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings, 2016-August, 1135-1140.
Serda, M. (2020). Reaction Time Variability Association with Safe Driving Indexes. European Transport Research Review, 7.
Theeuwes, J. (2021). Self-explaining roads: What does visual cognition tell us about designing safer roads?. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 15.
Tonsen, M., Baumann, C. K., & Dierkes, K. (2020). A High-Level Description and Performance Evaluation of Pupil Invisible.
Toxopeus, R., Attalla, S., Kodsi, S., & Oliver, M. (2018). Driver Response Time to Midblock Crossing Pedestrians.
Wang, X., Liu, S., Cai, B., Hurwitz, D., Guo, Q., & Wang, X. (2023). Sample Size Study of Driving Simulator Experiment for Freeway Design Safety Evaluations. Transportation Research Record, 2677(6), 73-92.
Zhuang, X., & Wu, C. (2011). Pedestrians’ crossing behaviors and safety at unmarked roadway in China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(6), 1927-1936.
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andrea Paliotto, Costanza Carini, Monica Meocci, Camilla Mazzi, Francesca La Torre, Alessandro Marradi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Funding data
-
HORIZON EUROPE Climate, Energy and Mobility
Grant numbers grant agreement 101075068






